PRACTICE AS RESEARCH (PaR)
At this point in my study I have begun to reread the Module 3 Handbook in more depth, highlighting important notes and references.
A theory I was intrigued by was 'Practice as Research' (PaR) theorised by Nelson (2013).
I have made written notes in relation to:
How other academic disciplines view PaR.
The foundations and terminology of PaR:
- The position of practice within the methodology (p.27)
- Praxis
- 'Location in Lineage' (p.31)
- De-familiarisation and Affirmation (p.32)
- Interactive Process
Whilst reading exerts from this book I recognise the significance this theory has in relation to my approach as a research practitioner and highlights some important points to consider, recognise and acknowledge whilst undertaking this Module. I feel this read has initiated a deeper awareness regarding the impotence of the contribution of practices to my research inquiry, whether it be my own practice or the praxis of others.
"My use of praxis is intended to denote the possibility of thought within 'theory' and 'practice' in an interactive process of 'doing-reflecting-reading-articulating-doing'.
(Nelson, p. 32, 2013).
If anyone else has studied this theory I'd be interested to hear your thoughts?
Ellie
Personal Reflection:
- Reading skills are developing, able to extract key information rather than over read therefore loosing study time.
- Organising my notes and thoughts into a blog solidifies new knowledge.
- I am more aware of academic terminology.
- Keeping a reflective journal is beneficial to reflect on my progression and for my Research Report.
Comments
Post a Comment